De Armond v. Gurney
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Arnold De Armond appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. De Armond v. Gurney, No. 2:15-cv-00203-RBS-LRL (E.D. Va. Sept. 21, 2016 & Feb. 24, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Arnold De ARMOND v. Patrick J. GURNEY, Asst. Warden Anton W. Daniel, housing unit manager and Institutional Classification Authority (ICA) hearing officer T. S. Byrd, unit manager buildings three and four and also editor of a prison newsletter Lt. A. L. White, supervisor of building six Sgt. K. W. Forrest, institutional investigator Sgt. W. Lucas, attached to building three under unit manager byrd Sgt. W. L. Lewis, assistant hearings officer S. W. Allen, institutional hearings office, and S. Darby, unit manager for buildings one and two Lt. H. Manning, supervisor, personal property department L. Baker, corporal corrections officer working personal property
- Status
- Published