U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

McClary v. Crosson

McClary v. Crosson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 22, 2016 · Gregory, Motz, Traxler
670 F. App'x 834

McClary v. Crosson

Opinion of the Court

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald McClary seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order granting the Defendants an enlargement of time to answer his complaint or file a responsive pleading. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Because the magistrate judge’s order is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.