Cleveland v. Hall

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit November 28, 2016

Cleveland v. Hall, 671 F. App'x 55 (4th Cir. 2016)

Opinion of the Court

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

George Cleveland, III, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cleveland v. Hall, No. 6:15-cv-04384-RBH, 2016 WL 2892728 (D.S.C. May 18, 2016). We grant Cleveland’s motion to accept as timely filed his informal brief, and we dispense with oral *56argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name: George CLEVELAND, III v. Judge Daniel D. HALL, in his official capacity as Circuit Court Judge of South Carolina Karen C. Ratigan, in her official capacity as Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General of South Carolina
Status: Published