Bratton v. North Carolina
Opinion of the Court
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
George Andrew Bratton appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Brat-ton’s motion to assign counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bratton v. North Carolina, No. 5:16-cv-00021-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 81, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- George Andrew BRATTON, an individual, and The Estate of Geena Gee Bratton, Decedent v. State of NORTH CAROLINA a Business Entity or Governmental Agency Pat McCory, Gov., an Individual Mecklenburg County Division of Social Services, (DSS), a Business Entity or Governmental Agency Peggy Eagan, Director of DSS, an individual Chris Taylor, badge 211 in his individual and official capacity of Lieutenant McDowell County Sheriff Department Cederbrook Residential Center, a business entity The Estate of Henry Robert Bratton, Jr., Deceased Marian Diebel-bratton, individual Arlene Brokaw, individual and in her official capacity McEwen Funeral Service Pineville Chapel City, a business entity North Carolina Adoption Agency, a business entity or governmental agency
- Status
- Published