Clifton Webb v. University of North Carolina
Clifton Webb v. University of North Carolina
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1481
CLIFTON LEON WEBB,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL, a body politic and corporate institution of the State of North Carolina; GENA J. CARTER, sued in her individual and official capacities; DARIUS DIXON, Individually; BEN TRIPLETT, Individually,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00268-LCB-JEP)
Submitted: November 30, 2016 Decided: January 4, 2017
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
J. Heydt Philbeck, Sr., BAILEY & DIXON, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Roy Cooper, Attorney General of North Carolina, Joseph A. Newsome, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Clifton Leon Webb appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss Webb’s complaint alleging
claims under
42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 (2012), and Title VII of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e
to 2000e-17 (West 2008 & Supp. 2016) (Title VII). Webb
challenges on appeal only the district court’s dismissal of his
Title VII retaliation claim. We have considered Webb’s
arguments and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Webb v. Univ.
of N.C., No. 1:15-cv-00268-LCB-JEP (M.D.N.C. Mar. 30, 2016). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished