United States v. Mustafa Muhammad

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Mustafa Muhammad

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7065

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MUSTAFA MUHAMMAD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:14-cr-00055-REP-1)

Submitted: January 6, 2017 Decided: January 11, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mustafa Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Heather Hart Mansfield, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mustafa Muhammad appeals the district court’s order

granting the motion of the United States for the return of

Jencks Act material. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. We note that an agreed discovery order

provided that the material would be returned to the United

States at the conclusion of the case. Accordingly, we affirm.

United States v. Muhammad, No. 3:14-cr-00055-REP-1 (E.D. Va.

May 17, 2016). We deny the motion for default judgment and

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished