In Re: Ajamu Osborne v.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit January 18, 2017

Opinion

No. 16-2092

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:12-cr-00155-1)

Submitted: December 22, 2016 Decided: January 18, 2017

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ajamu Sawandi Osborne, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ajamu Sawandi Osborne petitions for a writ of mandamus,

alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on

his “application for out of time reconsideration and review of a

sentence imposed in violation of records accuracy laws and

constitution,” which Osborne filed while his direct appeal was

pending. He seeks an order from this court directing the

district court to act. Because there is no longer a pending

action in the district court, we conclude that the present

record does not reveal any undue delay. Accordingly, we deny

the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.