United States v. Eugene Milford
United States v. Eugene Milford
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1878
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
EUGENE MILFORD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:15-cv-02009-RMG)
Submitted: January 17, 2017 Decided: January 19, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugene Milford, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Eugene Milford appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary
judgment to the United States on its complaint and on Milford’s
counterclaims. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Milford, No.
2:15-cv-02009-RMG (D.S.C. July 28, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished