United States v. Eugene Milford

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Eugene Milford

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1878

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

EUGENE MILFORD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:15-cv-02009-RMG)

Submitted: January 17, 2017 Decided: January 19, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene Milford, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Eugene Milford appeals the district court’s order accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary

judgment to the United States on its complaint and on Milford’s

counterclaims. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Milford, No.

2:15-cv-02009-RMG (D.S.C. July 28, 2016). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished