U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

Derek Hendricks v. Mr. Casina

Derek Hendricks v. Mr. Casina
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 19, 2017

Derek Hendricks v. Mr. Casina

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6917

DEREK HENDRICKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MR. CASINA, Medical Supervisor; DOCTOR OWENS; NURSE NELSON, Defendants – Appellees, and SUPERINTENDENT KORNEGAY; MR. HAWKINS; DR. DAVIS; MS. HARRELL, Assistant Superintendent, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:13-ct-03090-D)

Submitted: January 17, 2017 Decided: January 19, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derek Hendricks, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Ginger Bagley Hunsucker, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Kelly Street Brown, Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Derek Hendricks appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants summary judgment on Hendricks’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, in which Hendricks alleged an Eighth Amendment claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical condition, and denying Hendricks’ postjudgment motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hendricks v. Casina, No. 5:13-ct- 03090-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 2015 & June 23, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.