U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

Muttaqin Abdullah v. Ernest Finney, III

Muttaqin Abdullah v. Ernest Finney, III
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 20, 2017

Muttaqin Abdullah v. Ernest Finney, III

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7288

MUTTAQIN FATIR ABDULLAH, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ERNEST A FINNEY, III; JAMES TURNER, Detective, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:16-cv-01276-JFA)

Submitted: January 17, 2017 Decided: January 20, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Muttaqin F. Abdullah, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Muttaqin F. Abdullah appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Abdullah v. Finney, No. 3:16-cv-01276-JFA (D.S.C. filed Sept.

13, and entered Sept. 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.