U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

Julio Sorto v. Phillip Stover

Julio Sorto v. Phillip Stover
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 25, 2017

Julio Sorto v. Phillip Stover

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7141

JULIO ZELAYA SORTO, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. PHILLIP STOVER; JOSEPH LIGHTSEY, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-ct-03130-FL)

Submitted: January 23, 2017 Decided: January 25, 2017

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julio Zelaya Sorto, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Nathan Douglas Childs, Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Julio Zelaya Sorto appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sorto v. Stover, No. 5:14-ct-03130-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 11, 2016). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.