Michael Munoz v. SunTrust Bank
Michael Munoz v. SunTrust Bank
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1766
MICHAEL MUNOZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SUNTRUST BANK,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:15-cv-00119-RLV-DCK)
Submitted: January 20, 2017 Decided: January 26, 2017
Before AGEE, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Munoz, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew William Krueger-Andes, Robert R. Marcus, SMITH MOORE LEATHERWOOD LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Michael Munoz appeals the district court’s order granting
SunTrust Bank’s motion to dismiss and dismissing Munoz’s civil
action for lack of prudential standing. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Munoz v. SunTrust
Bank, No. 5:15-cv-00119-RLV-DCK (W.D.N.C. June 3, 2016). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished