Rungrudee Suteerachanon v. McDonald's Restaurants of MD

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Rungrudee Suteerachanon v. McDonald's Restaurants of MD

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1981

RUNGRUDEE SUTEERACHANON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MCDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. (8:15-cv-03196-RWT)

Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rungrudee Suteerachanon, Appellant Pro Se. Nigel F. Telman, Amanda C. Wiley, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, Chicago, Illinois; Alex Chad Weinstein, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Rungrudee Suteerachanon appeals the magistrate judge’s

order awarding costs and attorney’s fees in favor of McDonald’s

Restaurants of Maryland, Inc. (McDonald’s), and the district

court’s order granting McDonald’s motion to dismiss

Suteerachanon’s discrimination and retaliation claims, brought

pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as

amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2008 & Supp.

2016). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in the

appealed-from orders. See Suteerachanon v. McDonald’s

Restaurants of Md., Inc., No. 8:15-cv-03196-RWT (D. Md. July 15,

2016 & July 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished