United States v. Sikeo Butler
United States v. Sikeo Butler
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7265
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SIKEO HARVELL BUTLER, a/k/a Keo,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:14-cr-00400-HMH-6)
Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sikeo Harvell Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Sikeo Harvell Butler appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for copies at government expense. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Butler, No. 6:14-cr-00400-HMH-6 (D.S.C. Aug. 30,
2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished