U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Mauricio Hernandez-Martinez

United States v. Mauricio Hernandez-Martinez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 3, 2017

United States v. Mauricio Hernandez-Martinez

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7406

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MAURICIO HERNANDEZ-MARTINEZ, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (5:12-cr-00039-MBS-1)

Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mauricio Hernandez-Martinez, Appellant Pro Se. Julius Ness Richardson, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Mauricio Hernandez-Martinez seeks to appeal the Government’s opposition to a motion in his criminal case. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545- (1949). Hernandez-Martinez does not appeal from an order of the district court. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.