United States v. James Palmer

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. James Palmer

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6918

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JAMES EDDIE PALMER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:93-cr-00090-AWA-2)

Submitted: January 6, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harry Dennis Harmon, Jr., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Andrew Curtis Bosse, Darryl James Mitchell, Randy Carl Stoker, Assistant United States Attorneys, V. Kathleen Dougherty, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James Eddie Palmer appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion nunc pro tunc to adjust his sentence pursuant

to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5G1.3(b). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Palmer, No. 2:93-cr-00090-AWA-2 (E.D. Va. June 28,

2016). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished