United States v. Darryl Riley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Darryl Riley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7408

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DARRYL GLEN RILEY, a/k/a Kendu,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:98-cr-00101-HEH-1)

Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darryl Glen Riley, Appellant Pro Se. Heather Hart Mansfield, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Darryl Glen Riley appeals the district court’s order

denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have

reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not

abuse its discretion in denying Riley’s motion. See United

States v. Smalls,

720 F.3d 193, 195

(4th Cir. 2013).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United

States v. Riley, No. 3:98-cr-00101-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 28,

2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished