United States v. Daniel Watlington
United States v. Daniel Watlington
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7347
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DANIEL WATLINGTON, a/k/a Gator Slim,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:05-cr-00004-F-1)
Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel Watlington, Appellant Pro Se. S. Katherine Burnette, Joshua Bryan Royster, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Daniel Watlington appeals the district court’s order
denying his “Request for Nunc Pro Tunc Amendment for Addendum
Presentence Report.” We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Watlington, No. 5:05-
cr-00004-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished