United States v. Daniel Watlington

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Daniel Watlington

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7347

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DANIEL WATLINGTON, a/k/a Gator Slim,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:05-cr-00004-F-1)

Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Watlington, Appellant Pro Se. S. Katherine Burnette, Joshua Bryan Royster, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Daniel Watlington appeals the district court’s order

denying his “Request for Nunc Pro Tunc Amendment for Addendum

Presentence Report.” We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Watlington, No. 5:05-

cr-00004-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 2016). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished