Matthew Wakefield v. Circuit Court of Virginia

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Matthew Wakefield v. Circuit Court of Virginia

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7329

MATTHEW WAKEFIELD, In Propria Persona,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CIRCUIT COURT OF VIRGINIA, d/b/a Karin Riley Porter,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00666-AJT-JFA)

Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew Wakefield, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Matthew Wakefield appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)

(2012). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal

is frivolous. See

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the

district court. Wakefield v. Circuit Court of Va., No. 1:16-cv-

00666-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2016). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished