Kalvin Marshall v. Robert Payne

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Kalvin Marshall v. Robert Payne

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7321

KALVIN MARSHALL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ROBERT E. PAYNE, Judge; HENRY E. HUDSON, Judge,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior District Judge. (3:13-cv-00286-JRS)

Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kalvin Marshall, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kalvin Marshall appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion to reopen his Bivens * action which was dismissed in

April 2015. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Marshall v. Payne, No. 3:13-cv-00286-JRS (E.D.

Va. Sept. 19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished