UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1604

JAY CLOGG REALTY GROUP, INC.; STANLEY ADOFF; AGV SPORTS GROUP, INC.; MICHAEL PARROTTE; STEVEN G. BERRY; BREY CORP.; DEBRA COLBERT; GERMANTOWN COPY CENTER, INC.; GOLD LEINS & ADOFF; PEGGY HARRIS; HOLDEN ROGERS; KATHLYNNE RAMIREZ ESQUIRE LLC; ANDREW RENGARTS; STEPHEN A. SHECHTEL; JAMES J. TEMPLE JR. PA,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

and

JAY CLOGG; ELMECO ENGINEERING, INC.; TIBOR SARKADY; MICHAEL BREY; JOHNNY R. GARZA; KENSINGTON PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC.; STANLEY SHAPIRO; JAMES J. TEMPLE, JR.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; METLIFE GROUP, INC.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:15-cv-00493-DKC)

Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: February 3, 2017

Before DIAZ, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stephen H. Ring, STEPHEN H. RING, P.C., Rockville, Maryland, for Appellants. Robert R. Niccolini, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., Washington, D.C.; Daniel T. Stabile, SHUTTS & BOWEN LLP, Miami, Florida, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order denying their

Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d) request, and granting summary judgment in

favor of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and MetLife Group,

Inc., on Plaintiffs’ claims, brought pursuant to the Telephone

Consumer Protection Act,

(West 2014 & Supp.

2016), and the Maryland Telephone Consumer Protection Act,

to 14-3202 (West 2013). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jay

Clogg Realty Grp., Inc. v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., No. 8:15-cv-

00493-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 8, 2016; May 2, 2016). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3