Bradley Maxwell v. Harold Clarke
Bradley Maxwell v. Harold Clarke
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7352
BRADLEY MAXWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HAROLD CLARKE; DAVID ROBINSON; TERRY GLENN; HENRY PONTON; LESLIE FLEMING, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (7:15-cv-00468-NKM-RSB)
Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bradley Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Hull Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Bradley Maxwell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Maxwell v. Clarke, No. 7:15-cv-00468-NKM-RSB (W.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.