U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

Bradley Maxwell v. Harold Clarke

Bradley Maxwell v. Harold Clarke
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 3, 2017

Bradley Maxwell v. Harold Clarke

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7352

BRADLEY MAXWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HAROLD CLARKE; DAVID ROBINSON; TERRY GLENN; HENRY PONTON; LESLIE FLEMING, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (7:15-cv-00468-NKM-RSB)

Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bradley Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Hull Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Bradley Maxwell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Maxwell v. Clarke, No. 7:15-cv-00468-NKM-RSB (W.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2016).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.