Alfred LaSure v. SC Mental Health

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Alfred LaSure v. SC Mental Health

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7338

ALFRED WILLIAM LASURE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SC MENTAL HEALTH; CYNTHIA HELFF, Program Director, Individually and in her Official Capacity; JOHN MCGILL, State Director, In his Official and Individual Capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (9:15-cv-01357-RBH)

Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alfred LaSure, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Albert Kinney, Jr., Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., MCKAY LAW FIRM, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Alfred William LaSure appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, as modified,

and denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. LaSure v.

SC Mental Health, No. 9:15-cv-01357-RBH (D.S.C. Sept. 20, 2016).

In light of this disposition, we deny as moot the Appellees’ motion

to strike LaSure’s second informal opening brief and amended

informal opening brief. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished