Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Jitendrakumar Jagubhai Patel, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and Patel’s claims, and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2016); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Patel (B.I.A. June 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED