U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

Robert Earl Williamson v. Rick Clark

Robert Earl Williamson v. Rick Clark
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 24, 2017

Robert Earl Williamson v. Rick Clark

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7483

ROBERT EARL WILLIAMSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RICK CLARK, Sheriff of Pickens; DIRECTOR OF JAIL, Pickens County, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (8:15-cv-04515-TMC)

Submitted: February 15, 2017 Decided: February 24, 2017

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Earl Williamson, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Miller Snyder, CLARKSON WALSH TERRELL & COULTER, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Robert Earl Williamson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Order, Williamson v. Clark, No. 8:15-cv-04515-TMC (D.S.C. Oct.

14, 2016), ECF No. 71. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.