Anthony Kelly v. Frank Bishop

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Anthony Kelly v. Frank Bishop

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7399

ANTHONY QUENTIN KELLY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

WARDEN FRANK B. BISHOP, JR.; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:15-cv-03795-RDB)

Submitted: February 17, 2017 Decided: February 24, 2017

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Quentin Kelly, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Anthony Quentin Kelly appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012) complaint for failure to

state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Kelly v. Bishop, No. 1:15-cv-03795-RDB

(D. Md. Sept. 27, 2016). We deny Kelly’s motions to participate

in oral argument, to reconsider, and to appoint counsel. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished