Anthony Kelly v. Frank Bishop
Anthony Kelly v. Frank Bishop
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7399
ANTHONY QUENTIN KELLY, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. WARDEN FRANK B. BISHOP, JR.; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:15-cv-03795-RDB)
Submitted: February 17, 2017 Decided: February 24, 2017
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Quentin Kelly, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Anthony Quentin Kelly appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kelly v. Bishop, No. 1:15-cv-03795-RDB (D. Md. Sept. 27, 2016). We deny Kelly’s motions to participate in oral argument, to reconsider, and to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.