U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

Annette Cummings v. International Union Security

Annette Cummings v. International Union Security
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 27, 2017

Annette Cummings v. International Union Security

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2369

ANNETTE CUMMINGS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL UNION SECURITY POLICE AND FIRE PROFESSIONALS OF AMERICA (SPFPA), LOCAL 555; DARIO MARQUEZ, CEO, MVM Inc.; GORDON GREGORY, Esq., Gregory, Moore, Jeakle & Brooks, PC, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01868-RDB)

Submitted: February 23, 2017 Decided: February 27, 2017

Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Annette Cummings, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Jacob Clark, GREGORY, MOORE, JEAKLE & BROOKS, P.C., Detroit, Michigan; Peter Joshua Leff, MOONEY, GREEN, SAINDON, MURPHY & WELCH, PC, Washington, D.C.; Jason Matthew Branciforte, Brandon Robert Mita, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Washington, D.C.; for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Annette Cummings appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint alleging breach of employment contract and violations of the National Labor Relations Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cummings v. Int’l Union Sec. Police & Fire Prof’ls of Am., No. 1:16-cv-01868- RDB (D. Md. Nov. 18, 2016). We grant Cummings leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, grant Appellees’ motion to extend time to file the informal response brief, and deny Cummings’ motion to strike the informal response brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.