U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

Starsha Sewell v. Deborah Chasanow

Starsha Sewell v. Deborah Chasanow
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 8, 2017

Starsha Sewell v. Deborah Chasanow

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2294

STARSHA M. SEWELL, A Natural Person and Resident of Maryland On Behalf of Herself and Her African American Son’s, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, A Natural Person, acting as a Federal Judge In the United States of America, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:16-cv-03256-JKB)

Submitted: March 3, 2017 Decided: March 8, 2017

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court’s orders dismissing this civil action and denying her motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Chasanow, No. 1:16-cv-03256- JKB (D. Md. Sept. 29, Oct. 7, Oct. 17 & Oct. 24, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.