U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

Supreme Raheem Ackbar v. Lieutenant McPherson

Supreme Raheem Ackbar v. Lieutenant McPherson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 9, 2017

Supreme Raheem Ackbar v. Lieutenant McPherson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7391

SUPREME RAHEEM ACKBAR, a/k/a Ronald Gary, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. LIEUTENANT MCPHERSON; SERGEANT BOGERSRODE, Defendants – Appellees, and MICHAEL MCCALL; SERGEANT BOGASTROKE; OFFICER MCCANTS; CAPTAIN STONEBREAKER; RAMMARINE JAGLAL, Lieber CI Dentist; GWENDOLYN T. STOKES, Registered Nurse at Lee Correctional Institution; WILLIAM R. BYARS, JR., Commissioner of The South Carolina Department of Corrections Commissioner, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge. (2:14-cv-02246-RMG)

Submitted: February 27, 2017 Decided: March 9, 2017

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Supreme Raheem Ackbar, Appellant Pro Se. Leigh Powers Boan, David J. Mills, MCNAIR LAW FIRM, PA, Pawleys Island, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Supreme Raheem Ackbar appeals the district court’s order entering judgment in favor of defendants following a bench trial on Ackbar’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and Ackbar’s claims and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ackbar v. McPherson, No. 2:14-cv-02246-RMG (D.S.C. Sept. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.