U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

Phillip Mizrach v. United States

Phillip Mizrach v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 9, 2017

Phillip Mizrach v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1550

PHILLIP MIZRACH, as Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Abraham I. Kurland, Deceased, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 16-1551

PHILLIP MIZRACH, as Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Abraham I. Kurland, Deceased, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:11-cv-01153-RDB; 1:08-cv-02030-AMD)

Submitted: March 1, 2017 Decided: March 9, 2017 Before TRAXLER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip Mizrach, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Neil R. White, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Phillip Mizrach appeals the district court’s orders denying several postjudgment motions he filed following the dismissal of two Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2012) complaints. We have reviewed the record included on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mizrach v. United States, Nos. 1:11- cv-01153-RDB; 1:08-cv-02030-AMD (D. Md. Nov. 12, 2015; Apr. 13, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.