Clotilde Jimenez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Clotilde Jimenez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1926
CLOTILDE C. JIMENEZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.; SHAPIRO & BROWN, LLP, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00624-CMH-MSN)
Submitted: January 10, 2017 Decided: March 9, 2017
Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clotilde C. Jimenez, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Montgomery Barnwell, Matthew Douglas Patterson, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina, Nathan Ira Brown, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Huntington, West Virginia, Sarah Reimers McIntee, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Clotilde C. Jimenez appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jimenez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 1:16-cv-00624-CMH-MSN (E.D. Va. filed July 26, 2016; entered July 27, 2016). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.