Gricer Bernard v. Megan Brennan

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Gricer Bernard v. Megan Brennan, 680 F. App'x 243 (4th Cir. 2017)

Gricer Bernard v. Megan Brennan

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gricer Bernard appeals the district court’s order granting Megan J. Brennan’s motion to dismiss Bernard’s amended complaint alleging retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2016). We have considered Bernard’s arguments and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bernard v. Brennan, No. 1:15-cv-00777-WO-LPA, 2016 WL 3580753 (M.D.N.C. June 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
Gricer BERNARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Megan J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General, Defendant-Appellee
Status
Unpublished