U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

Ras. Stefen Harris v. Warden Eagleton

Ras. Stefen Harris v. Warden Eagleton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 27, 2017 · Motz, King, Diaz
682 F. App'x 219

Ras. Stefen Harris v. Warden Eagleton

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not -binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ras. Stefen E. Harris appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and denying relief on his 42 U;S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. Warden, No. 0:15-cv-04173-HMH, 2016 WL 4253739 (D.S.C. Aug. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.