United States v. Steven Twitty

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
United States v. Steven Twitty, 683 F. App'x 194 (4th Cir. 2017)
Davis, King, Motz, Per Curiam

United States v. Steven Twitty

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven Lavour Twitty appeals from the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He argues that he was improperly sentenced as a career offender. Twitty’s claim is barred by Beckles v. United States, — U.S. —, —, 137 *195 S.Ct. 886, 197 L.Ed.2d 145 (2017). According^ we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this, court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven Lavour TWITTY, Defendant-Appellant
Cited By
1 case
Status
Unpublished