U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Steven Twitty

United States v. Steven Twitty
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 31, 2017 · Davis, King, Motz, Per Curiam
683 F. App'x 194

United States v. Steven Twitty

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven Lavour Twitty appeals from the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He argues that he was improperly sentenced as a career offender. Twitty’s claim is barred by Beckles v. United States, — U.S. —, —, 137 *195 S.Ct. 886, 197 L.Ed.2d 145 (2017). According^ we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this, court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.