Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Timothy E. Davis appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his amended complaint in which he raised numerous claims arising out of the foreclosure on his property. We. have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and find no error in the district court’s dismissal of Davis’ claims. Specifically, we find no merit to Davis’ claims asserting breach of fiduciary duty or breach of contract under Virginia law; nor do we find an actionable claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (2012). Therefore we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Samuel I. White, P.C., No. 1:16-cv-00036-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. June 10, *179 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED