Ronald Emrit v. Continuum Legal
Ronald Emrit v. Continuum Legal
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Ronald Satish Emrit appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for failure to state a claim. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Emrit’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Emrit has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. * See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Even assuming, without deciding, that the issues Emrit articulates in his notice of appeal are properly before us, we find no reversible error in the district court’s dispositive ruling on those bases.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.