U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Rafael Hernandez-Rodriguez

United States v. Rafael Hernandez-Rodriguez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 3, 2017 · Niemeyer, King, Floyd
688 F. App'x 193

United States v. Rafael Hernandez-Rodriguez

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rafael Hernandez-Rodriguez appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). On appeal, he challenges the extent of the district court’s reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. The district court reduced his sentence to the bottom of his amended Guidelines range based on Amendment 782. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Hernandez-Rodriguez, No. 1:11-cr-00309-WO-5 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.