U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

Lynda DeLellis v. Maude Rumple

Lynda DeLellis v. Maude Rumple
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 25, 2017 · King, Agee, Wynn
689 F. App'x 752

Lynda DeLellis v. Maude Rumple

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*753 PER CURIAM:

Lynda J. DeLellis appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman * doctrine, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012), and denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because DeLellis’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition of her complaint and motion, DeLellis has forfeited appellate review of the court’s orders. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Tr. Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.