U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

United States v. James Sweets

United States v. James Sweets
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 31, 2017 · Harris, Motz, Per Curiam, Thacker
691 F. App'x 90

United States v. James Sweets

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not. binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Dana Sweets appeals the district court’s letter order rejecting as meritless his objection to subject matter jurisdiction and denying his motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sweets, No. 1:04-cr-00564-CCB-4 (D. Md. Mar. 2, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.