Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Bernard Ray Richardson appeals from the district court’s orders denying his request to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee and denying his motion for reconsideration. The district court found that Richardson did not make a sufficient showing that he was under imminent danger of serious physical injury and dismissed his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2012). We have reviewed the record, including the dismissal orders identified as qualifying strikes pursuant to § 1915(g), and find no reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. Dulanes, No. 1:16-cv-00356-JCC-TCB (E.D. Va. Apr. 12, 2016 & June 1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma *104 terials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED