Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Raymon Anthony Higgs seeks to appeal from the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The district court’s order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012).

Higgs previously filed a § 2255 motion that was adjudicated on the merits. See Higgs v. United States, Nos. 3:04-cr-00867-CMC; 3:06-cv-01829-CMC (D.S.C. Mar. 15, 2007) (unpublished). Thus, Higgs’ current § 2255 motion is successive. Higgs has not obtained authorization from this court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2012), to file a successive § 2255 motion. In the absence of prefiling authorization from this court, the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider the motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED