U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Bernard Celestine

United States v. Bernard Celestine
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 23, 2017 · Shedd, Wynn, Diaz
692 F. App'x 137

United States v. Bernard Celestine

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Celestine appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Celestine, No. 4:95-cr-00041-H-9 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 25, 2017); see also Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 (“After giving any notice it considers appropriate, the court may at any time correct a clerical error in a judgment, order, or other part of the record, or correct an error in the record arising from oversight or omission.” (emphasis added)). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.