U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Andrew Jackson

United States v. Andrew Jackson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 27, 2017

United States v. Andrew Jackson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6220

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANDREW CHARLES JACKSON, a/k/a William Benbow, a/k/a Ricky Antonio Bady, Sway, Defendant - Appellant

No. 17-6221

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANDREW CHARLES JACKSON, a/k/a William Benbow, a/k/a Ricky Antonio Bady, a/k/a Sway, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (3:00-cr-00046-JPB-RWT-1; 3:00- cr-00006-JPB-RWT-1) Submitted: June 22, 2017 Decided: June 27, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew Charles Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Andrew Charles Jackson appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions to reduce sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jackson, Nos. 3:00-cr-00046-JPB-RWT-1; 3:00-cr-00006-JPB-RWT-1 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 9, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.