U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

Ronald Satish Emrit v. Joe Heck

Ronald Satish Emrit v. Joe Heck
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 30, 2017 · Motz, Thacker, Harris
692 F. App'x 705

Ronald Satish Emrit v. Joe Heck

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Satish Emrit appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for improper venue. On appeal, we limit our review to the issues raised in Emrit’s informal brief. Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed the record in light of these arguments and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Emrit v. Heck, No. 8:17-cv-00074-PWG (D. Md. Jan. 26, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.