U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

Jamar Cannon v. Edward Hull

Jamar Cannon v. Edward Hull
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 13, 2017 · Wilkinson, Wynn, Harris
693 F. App'x 187

Jamar Cannon v. Edward Hull

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamar A. Cannon seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Coup., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Cannon seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.