Unpublished opinions áre not binding precedent in this circuit.

David A. Hicks appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion to destroy evidence. The motion was granted in accordance with the district court’s local rules, and Hicks offers no evidence to support his claim that the exhibits support a claim of actual innocence. Accordingly, we affirm the grant of the Government’s motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED