U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Michael Matthews

United States v. Michael Matthews
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 1, 2017 · Agee, Floyd, Hamilton, Per Curiam
694 F. App'x 183

United States v. Michael Matthews

Opinion

*184 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael F. Matthews appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Matthews, No. 3:07-cr-00226-REP-RCY-1 (E.D. Va. May 18, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.