My'Ka El v. R. Reese
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
My’Ka El appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for the appointment of counsel and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. El v. Reese, 3:16-cv-00051-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Aug 18, 2016 & Feb. 28, 2017). We deny El’s motion seeking a restraining order and the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- My’Ka EL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. REESE, Officer, Defendant-Appellee, and Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department; M. Sullivan, Officer; S. Selogy, Officer; FNU Meyers, Officer; FNU Agape, Officer; K. S. Kodad, Officer; FNU Issac, Officer; FNU Airtone, Lieutenant; S. Mobley; T. Moore; T. Wilson; J. Fletcher, Officer; J. Parker; P. Moore; L.B. Diggs; B. Butler; Nurse FNU Green, Sergeant; M. W. Womble; M. T. Retort; B. Scarey; T. Castano; FNU Stouts, Sergeant; R. Monroe; J. H. Frison; R. Burnett; Bradon Jolly, North Carolina State Trooper; W. L. Canter; Cooper Jerrell, Mecklenburg County Sheriff; FNU Eason; FNU Street, Sergeant; FNU Gant, Sergeant; FNU Hood, Officer; R. Chapman, Mecklenburg County Magistrate, Defendants
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Unpublished