U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

In Re: Mustafa Muhammad v.

In Re: Mustafa Muhammad v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 10, 2017 · Gregory, Wilkinson, Motz
694 F. App'x 212

In Re: Mustafa Muhammad v.

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mustafa Muhammad petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion for new trial. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.