U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

Crescencio Perez-Perez v. M. Ray

Crescencio Perez-Perez v. M. Ray
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 21, 2017 · Keenan, Thacker, Harris
696 F. App'x 104

Crescencio Perez-Perez v. M. Ray

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Crescencio Perez-Perez appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Perez-Perez v. Ray, No. 9:16-cv-03574-CMC, 2017 WL 1135220 (D.S.C. Mar. 27, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.